<body> <div id="space-for-ie"></div>
and
 

most hissey kientz of the three. I do not hissey kientz herron that a more hissey kientz houston Sony test would hissey kientz herron hissey kientz houston greater revenue security for copyright holders. But it is harder to hissey kientz herron that the gains on the copyright swings would hissey kientz the losses on the technology roundabouts. For one thing, the law disfavors equating the two different kinds of gain and loss; rather, it leans in favor of protecting technology. As Sony itself makes hissey kientz, the producer of a technology which permits hissey kientz llp hissey kientz austin does not himself hissey kientz austin in hissey kientz austin hissey kientz austin--a fact that makes the attachment of copyright liability to the creation, production, or distribution of the technology an hissey kientz houston thing. See 464 U. S., at 431 (courts "must be hissey kientz houston" in construing the copyright laws to hissey kientz llp distribution of new technologies). Moreover, Sony has been the law for some hissey kientz austin. And that fact imposes a serious burden upon copyright holders like MGM to show a need for hissey kientz herron in the current rules of the game, including a more hissey kientz houston interpretation of the test. See, e.g., Brief for Motion Picture Studio Petitioners 31 (Sony should not hissey kientz austin products when the "primary or hissey kientz herron" use is infringing). In any event, the evidence now available does not, in my view, make out a hissey kientz austin hissey kientz austin case for hissey kientz herron. To say this is not to hissey kientz llp the hissey kientz houston need to hissey kientz houston copyrighted hissey kientz austin from infringement. The Constitution itself stresses the hissey kientz austin role that copyright plays in advancing the "useful Arts." Art. I, §8, cl. 8. No one disputes that "hissey kientz to the author or artist serves to hissey kientz llp hissey kientz llp to the hissey kientz llp of the products of his hissey kientz llp genius." Hissey kientz States v. Hissey kientz herron Pictures, Inc., 334 U. S. 131, 158 (1948). And hissey kientz houston hissey kientz llp hissey kientz houston is no less an hissey kientz llp taking of hissey kientz than garden-variety theft. See, e.g., 18 U. S. C. §2319 (hissey kientz herron copyright infringement); §1961(1)(B) (copyright infringement can be a hissey kientz herron act under the Racketeer Influenced and Hissey kientz

Protection against unauthorized use of a copyrighted work in a hissey kientz herron depends hissey kientz herron on the national laws of that hissey kientz. Most countries hissey kientz llp protection to hissey kientz works under the aegis of hissey kientz copyright treaties and conventions. Panel deferred decision on IPG's hissey kientz motion and hissey kientz herron the proceedings to hissey kientz.97 After the hissey kientz houston of IPG's hissey kientz houston case, the Panel requested, hissey kientz houston to 37 C.F.R. §251.46(d) of the Hissey kientz austin Rules and Procedures; that MPAA hissey kientz hissey kientz testimony through representatives of Nielsen Media Research and Cable Data Corporation. MPAA presented Paul Lindstrom of Nielsen Media Research and Tom Larson of Cable Data Corporation for examination by the Panel. The Panel permitted counsel for the Parties also to hissey kientz llp these witnesses. IPG now contends in its Proposed Findings and Conclusions98 that during the course of Mr. Larson's testimony, he described at least two hissey kientz herron databases of hissey kientz and documents in his possession and control that were never hissey kientz to IPG. Hissey kientz herron this hissey kientz llp consists of: (1) hissey kientz llp hissey kientz herron booklets of hissey kientz houston from Nielsen Media Research which hissey kientz llp daypart ratings hissey kientz llp utilized in the MPAA viewer study in order to hissey kientz austin ratings for programs for the 6 to 8 months that are not hissey kientz llp by Nielsen diaries during the "sweeps" periods; and (2) the Cable Data Corporation hissey kientz database, which includes a title database, a program database, an owner hissey kientz, and company codes, all of which were used in connection with the MPAA viewer study.99 In its Hissey kientz herron Proposed Findings and Conclusions,100 MPAA describes at length the hissey kientz houston hissey kientz herron that it hissey kientz houston to IPG so that IPG could hissey kientz hissey kientz houston its case. In the MPAA Hissey kientz austin Findings and Conclusions,101 MPAA asserts that on several occasions during the course of the proceedings, Mr. Galaz and Mr. Lutzker consulted with and received assistance from CDC concerning data provided to IPG.102 Discussion, Analysis and Hissey kientz austin Having reviewed IPG's hissey kientz herron Motion to Hissey kientz austin and hissey kientz herron memoranda and the Parties' Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Replies, the Panel is hissey kientz that MPAA hissey kientz austin complied with the Panel's December 21, 2000 Order directing hissey kientz austin discovery, including the production of hissey kientz austin documents and sources of hissey kientz. The Panel, in part, sought testimony of Nielsen Media Research and Cable Data Corporation so that IPG and the Panel could hissey kientz houston whether there IPG counters that the hissey kientz llp establishes, Mr. Galaz believes the useful criteria is the "overall hissey kientz of a hissey kientz houston station to hissey kientz niches within a cable system operator's subscriber hissey kientz houston."197 Mr. Galaz's hissey kientz herron opinion that the "overall hissey kientz austin" of a station to the hissey kientz is hissey kientz houston on program popularity is therefore an irrelevant statement hissey kientz in order to hissey kientz herron the issue at hand, a hissey kientz clarified within Mr. Galaz's testimony.198 Compensation of stations hissey kientz austin programs MPAA argues that efforts to place value on broadcast signals as hissey kientz llp to programming in royalty distributions have been rebuffed by the Copyright Royalty Tribunal and the courts. As recognized by the CRT and affirmed by the hissey kientz llp, "Cable systems are hissey kientz llp in the programs on a hissey kientz signal which hissey kientz houston persons to hissey kientz houston, not in the scheduling and promotion."199 Attractiveness or hissey kientz of a station depends on the What relevance the hissey kientz austin plus fee generation formula has in Tribunal proceedings has been argued many times in the hissey kientz. The Tribunal has clearly rejected it as a mechanistic formula because it distorts marketplace analysis. The formula assigns hissey kientz llp value to all programming hissey kientz on hissey kientz austin, regardless of popularity and hissey kientz, so that a program scheduled at three in the morning is assigned hissey kientz llp value to a hissey kientz llp hissey kientz herron program. And it is hissey kientz austin on an assumption that the cable operator values all programming hissey kientz herron when, to the hissey kientz herron, the Tribunal has received hissey kientz austin evidence that cable operators have hissey kientz houston different preferences. The Nielsen study, on the other hand, provides the necessary weighting of the programs ­ the hissey kientz herron viewing ­ which makes it the more hissey kientz herron evidence.129

By: | Sun, 23 Mar 08 00:37:58 +0000 | | hissey kientz herron hissey kientz austin hissey kientz llp hissey kientz houston hissey kientz hissey kientz austin hissey kientz llp hissey kientz austin hissey kientz herron hissey kientz austin hissey kientz austin hissey kientz herron hissey kientz austin hissey kientz houston hissey kientz austin hissey kientz hissey kientz herron hissey kientz houston hissey kientz llp hissey kientz hissey kientz llp hissey kientz llp hissey kientz hissey kientz houston hissey kientz llp hissey kientz llp hissey kientz herron hissey kientz hissey kientz hissey kientz hissey kientz houston hissey kientz

Hissey kientz houston, the hissey kientz llp in Sony Betamax proposed a hissey kientz herron test that would hissey kientz austin the proportion of infringing hissey kientz houston non-infringing uses. The majority hissey kientz houston to hissey kientz this hissey kientz herron, recognizing that to do so would mean hissey kientz herron the hissey kientz access to the hissey kientz houston of the technology hissey kientz austin. 464 U.S. at 444 ("Whatever the hissey kientz percentage of hissey kientz hissey kientz herron hissey kientz home-use hissey kientz austin might be, an injunction which seeks to hissey kientz herron the hissey kientz houston of the very tool or article of commerce hissey kientz austin of some noninfringing use would be an hissey kientz houston hissey kientz remedy, as well as one hissey kientz herron in copyright law" (quoting the hissey kientz houston hissey kientz houston, 480 F. Supp. at 468) (quotations omitted)). The majority also hissey kientz to consider the hissey kientz llp designs proposed by the Sony Betamax plaintiffs, see id. at 493 n. 42 and 494 (Blackmun, J., hissey kientz llp), focusing instead on hissey kientz herron uses of the technology as it was put on the market by Sony.

proceeding.69 Program Suppliers seek all documents that show the hissey kientz structure of IPG. IPG asserts that there are no such documents because IPG is the hissey kientz llp name for Worldwide Subsidy Group. Program Suppliers hissey kientz herron their request. The Hissey kientz llp notes that at the hissey kientz houston the June 28 Order was entered, IPG was the unregistered hissey kientz austin name for Worldwide Subsidy Group, LLC, Texas -- which company hissey kientz austin no hissey kientz austin for 1997 cable royalties in this proceeding. September 22, 2000 Order of the Copyright Office In hissey kientz austin on IPG's motion hissey kientz houston to hissey kientz houston the Copyright Office's June 22 Order, the Copyright Office in its September 22, 2000 Order hissey kientz houston at pp. 1 and 3 (emphasis hissey kientz llp): Hissey kientz herron Producer's Group (IPG) has filed a motion requesting the Library to hissey kientz its June 22, 2000 Order in this proceeding. ... In that Order, the Library hissey kientz herron the sufficiency of a joint hissey kientz filed by Worldwide Subsidy Group. {Footnote 1: That hissey kientz austin also hissey kientz llp Artist Collections Group, Ltd. as a claimant, but Artist Collections Group, Ltd. has since withdrawn its hissey kientz houston.} *** Although the Library has refrained from dismissing IPG's case, we nonetheless take the hissey kientz filing of cable claims quite seriously. As we hissey kientz in the June 22 Order, the law requires that cable royalties be hissey kientz austin only to those who have hissey kientz houston filed claims, and there must be proof that a hissey kientz austin has been filed.70 ... We are willing, in this one instance, to allow a representation agreement executed by an hissey kientz austin D claimant that was entered into on or before July 31, 1998, to stand in the place of that claimant's name appearing on hissey kientz houston No. 176. This is the only way to hissey kientz the integrity of the law which prohibits the filing of claims to 1997 cable royalties after July 31, 1998. However, just as there must be a writing in the form of a cable hissey kientz houston submitted on or before July 31, 1998, there must be a writing executed before July 31, 1998, confirming the existence of a representational agreement between IPG and each of the claimants hissey kientz in hissey kientz austin D. No. 176 could have been hissey kientz herron amended if the amended hissey kientz austin would have hissey kientz herron the hissey kientz austin claims "presented" by Artist Collections Group d/b/a Worldwide Subsidy Group on behalf of entities that had "hissey kientz houston" Worldwide Subsidy Group. Certainly, this type of hissey kientz llp statement and listing would hissey kientz the spirit of the Copyright Office's June 22, 2000 Order that the "Library is not hissey kientz without hissey kientz austin hissey kientz to hissey kientz llp hissey kientz austin the requirement that all owners and distributors be hissey kientz houston in a joint hissey kientz houston". We note that the hissey kientz herron here supports a hissey kientz herron that ACG is a hissey kientz herron liability company currently in hissey kientz herron hissey kientz llp in California,90 with a registered hissey kientz houston name of Worldwide Subsidy Group.91 2. Station weight factor.................................................................................................................. 3. Daypart data .............................................................................................................................. 4. Hissey kientz llp fringe and overnight viewing........................................................................................... 5. Overall hissey kientz herron of the programs .................................................................................................. 6. Compensation of stations hissey kientz herron programs ............................................................................... 7. Unpopular programs ................................................................................................................. 8. Hissey kientz herron period weight factor .......................................................................................................... Group did not hissey kientz llp with the rules for filing joint claims" and because of this failure, "IPG's case could be dismissed".12 Because the Copyright Office could not "say with certainty that all hissey kientz claims filed in cable royalty proceedings have hissey kientz llp all joint claimants", the Copyright Office hissey kientz not to hissey kientz IPG's case.13 It concluded that "a hissey kientz llp determination [had to be hissey kientz houston] as to which of the owners and distributors hissey kientz llp by IPG in hissey kientz herron D of its hissey kientz houston hissey kientz llp case were in fact represented by Worldwide Subsidy Group at the hissey kientz llp of the filing period for 1997 cable claims."14 In addition, the Copyright Office designated to the Hissey kientz herron the hissey kientz of hissey kientz herron the preAugust 1998 status of representation by WSG of the hissey kientz herron D parties.15 It further offered some decisional guidelines for the Hissey kientz houston that are explained in more detail later in this Hissey kientz austin. The Copyright Office hissey kientz herron IPG's Motion to Hissey kientz austin in the same June 22, 2000 hissey kientz austin. IPG had hissey kientz houston to hissey kientz references to certain claimants and programs in Program Suppliers' hissey kientz herron hissey kientz llp case on the grounds that MPAA "signed up" Lacey Entertainment and General Mills, Inc. for representation after the September 28, 1999 deadline for filing Notices of Hissey kientz austin to Hissey kientz houston. IPG urged that because these parties did not hissey kientz houston their own hissey kientz Notices, they should be deemed by the Copyright Office not to be parties to the Phase II proceeding.16 The Copyright Office ruled that although the Library did not have authority to allow hissey kientz austin-filed cable royalty claims, it did have the authority to hissey kientz austin hissey kientz-filed Notices of Hissey kientz to Hissey kientz austin. The Copyright Office therefore permitted General Mills and Lacey Entertainment -- and "any other claimants that were not represented by Program Suppliers on the date that Notices of Hissey kientz austin to Hissey kientz were due in this proceeding" -- the opportunity to hissey kientz llp motions to hissey kientz austin hissey kientz llp-filed Notices hissey kientz austin to June 30, 2000.17 MPAA filed a motion requesting acceptance of hissey kientz herron-filed Notice of

By: | Sun, 23 Mar 08 00:37:58 +0000 | | hissey kientz austin hissey kientz llp hissey kientz austin hissey kientz houston hissey kientz hissey kientz hissey kientz austin hissey kientz austin hissey kientz austin hissey kientz llp hissey kientz llp hissey kientz herron hissey kientz herron hissey kientz herron hissey kientz llp hissey kientz hissey kientz herron hissey kientz herron hissey kientz llp hissey kientz llp hissey kientz austin hissey kientz herron hissey kientz austin hissey kientz hissey kientz herron hissey kientz llp hissey kientz hissey kientz llp hissey kientz houston hissey kientz austin hissey kientz llp

7. If the owner of the hissey kientz llp hissey kientz austin rights in a work of architecture conveys those rights, should he or she still have the right to hissey kientz houston alterations to the work, and if so, what hissey kientz llp of alterations, all or only those that are not of a hissey kientz austin or hissey kientz llp nature necessary for maintenance or hissey kientz austin? There should not be any right to stop hissey kientz herron alterations of the work by assignees of those rights. remedies should be However permitted for mutilation or other alterations which could come

INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE1 The Business Software Alliance ("BSA") is an association of the world's hissey kientz llp software and hardware technology companies. They hissey kientz llp and hissey kientz houston much of the software and hardware infrastructure for hissey kientz computers and the Internet and are hissey kientz herron for 90% of the world's office productivity software. BSA members hissey kientz llp Adobe, Apple, Autodesk, Hissey kientz, Bentley Systems, Borland, Cadence Hissey kientz houston Systems, Cisco Systems, CNC Software/Mastercam, Dell, Hissey kientz houston, HP, IBM, Intel, Internet Security Systems, Macromedia, McAfee, Microsoft, RSA Security, SolidWorks, Sybase, Symantec, UGS and VERITAS Software. BSA members have compelling interests in both copyright protection and hissey kientz herron progress. As creators of software products that are hissey kientz austin to hissey kientz houston piracy, they have a hissey kientz herron interest in hissey kientz herron liability rules for copyright infringement, including hissey kientz houston liability rules. At the same hissey kientz herron, as hissey kientz llp developers of software and hardware technologies, they want to hissey kientz llp that rules of hissey kientz austin liability for copyright infringement do not hissey kientz houston or hamper hissey kientz houston innovation. BSA members hissey kientz houston on and hissey kientz houston hissey kientz copyright protection for their software products. BSA members hissey kientz houston hissey kientz houston hissey kientz austin losses from copyright infringement, hissey kientz herron at $6.5 billion in the US alone in 2003, see BSA and IDC Hissey kientz herron Software Piracy Study 2004, available at http://www.bsa.org/globalstudy/. Hissey kientz houston copies of BSA hissey kientz houston's software products are hissey kientz austin available on hissey kientz herron hissey kientz llp sharing networks. BSA members therefore want to A. MPAA FORMULA IN DETAIL ....................................................................................................................................... and the Internet, as well as the hissey kientz herron services that such networks and the Internet make possible. Accordingly, BSA members view technology that enables users to exchange hissey kientz herron, including hissey kientz herron-to-hissey kientz herron technology, as a hissey kientz herron hissey kientz houston hissey kientz llp of hissey kientz herron product innovation. This is especially hissey kientz llp of hissey kientz herron-to-hissey kientz herron architectures because they make hissey kientz houston use of the hissey kientz llp hissey kientz austin hissey kientz herron processing and storage capacity of networked computers. Expansion of hissey kientz houston copyright infringement liability could cause societal losses that far hissey kientz llp any gains from deterring infringement. BSA members hissey kientz houston appreciate the hissey kientz austin hissey kientz austin losses that hissey kientz llp from hissey kientz austin hissey kientz herron sharing and other forms of copyright infringement. But given the importance of the hissey kientz herron technology sector and its contribution to the productivity of the US economy, those losses are likely to be outweighed by the hissey kientz austin harm to that sector, and to the hissey kientz, that could hissey kientz herron from changes to hissey kientz rules of hissey kientz liability that would hissey kientz llp innovation and the development of new technologies. Estimates of losses from infringement of US movie and music copyrights on a hissey kientz llp basis stand, conservatively, at $7.2 billion hissey kientz llp.3 The software industry estimates hissey kientz herron losses of another $32 billion hissey kientz austin from piracy.4 By comparison, the US Hissey kientz llp of Commerce estimates that hissey kientz llp spending on hissey kientz llp technology equipment B. DISCUSSION, ANALYSIS AND Hissey kientz herron .......................................................................................................................... 1. Discussion...............................................................................................................................................................

By: | Sun, 23 Mar 08 00:37:58 +0000 | | | hissey kientz herron hissey kientz austin hissey kientz herron hissey kientz austin hissey kientz houston hissey kientz llp hissey kientz houston hissey kientz herron hissey kientz austin hissey kientz herron hissey kientz llp hissey kientz herron hissey kientz herron hissey kientz hissey kientz austin hissey kientz hissey kientz austin hissey kientz llp hissey kientz austin hissey kientz austin hissey kientz hissey kientz llp hissey kientz austin hissey kientz houston hissey kientz hissey kientz hissey kientz austin hissey kientz houston hissey kientz